http://www.zapatec.com

USAF tanker contract rebid



22 Aug 2008

The US Department of Defense has reopened the bidding for a controversial US$40 billion contract to build the US Air Force’s future tanker fleet.

The Pentagon released a revised request for proposals (RFP) on 6 August, which includes changes that appear to give new advantages to both Boeing and its competitor, a team of Northrop Grumman and EADS.

The RFP went to Northrop-Grumman and Boeing, and addresses concerns the Government Accountability Office raised about the original award of the contract in February.

The GAO recommended that the Air Force re-bid the contract, originally won by a Northrop Grumman/EADS/Airbus consortium in February.

Boeing protested the decision, and in June the GAO agreed that there were irregularities in the contracting process.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said DoD would address each of the GAO’s findings.

Defense officials will take a week to discuss elements of the draft with Northrop Grumman and Boeing.

  

tanker

Starting again

The GAO recommended that the USAF rebid the tanker contract after a Boeing protest was upheld.

More News

Boeing by any other name
21 Nov 2008
Boeing has undergone a name change and reorganisation in the Australian market.
Two-faced a good thing for CEA
21 Nov 2008
CEA have achieved a milestone in its upgrading of the ANZAC Frigate Anti-Ship Missile Defence.
New partnership for MilCIS
21 Nov 2008
The Defence CIOG and UNSW/ADFA have pooled their resources to co-host the MilCIS Conference.
Can you blame them…?
21 Nov 2008
The recent tragedy onboard a Russian-built submarine has caused India to rethink its decision to send its Navy personnel to train in Russia.

 

READER COMMENTS

There are no comments for this article.




 
FREE NEWSLETTER
Sign up here for your FREE e-newsletter!
 
Which UAV is JP129 most likely to go for now that the competition is open again?
Please make a selection
 
 
 
 

Future submarine

Project SEA1000, the future submarine, is upon us in more ways than one.

But what will the Collins replacement look like?

Will it be ready in 2025 when the first Collins is due for retirement?

How will the public react to a program that will last longer than 4-5 election cycles and cost more than any other Australian defence program in history?